The Democratic Alliance (DA) was very quick to pronounce the programme mothballed after Minister Tina Joemat-Pettersson informed a parliamentary committee that the April 1 deadline in the procurement process had not been met, and that no new date had been set.
Of course, the department of energy was equally quick to deny this, saying in a statement that the “process to procure had been delayed for more consultations but had not stalled”.
“There is a consultation process with key stakeholders that the department of energy has undertaken before issuing the request for proposals (RFP).”
“This consultation process has not yet been concluded and the RFP will be issued as soon as this process is concluded. The process is continuing and should not be rushed,” it said in a statement.
Besides the fact that the proposed six nuclear power stations would come with a price tag of R1trn, a number of interest groups, including the official opposition, voiced concerns about where the money was going to come from. There were also rumblings about the less-than-transparent way in which a Russian and Chinese service providers were being courted.
Questions were also raised about how realistic providing 9,6gW of nuclear power by 2030 is, given the continuous delays in getting the coal-fired station, Medupi, up and running.
On the other hand, the renewable energy procurement process has worked extremely well, with all projects being delivered on time. Begging the questions why renewables weren’t being considered as a serious contender to nuclear power.
Then there’s also the concerns about safety following the Fukushima disaster a few years ago.
Cash-strapped power utility Eskom, which relies heavily on coal for electricity generation, is scrambling to keep the lights on and raise the capital needed to build new coal-fired units and maintain its existing fleet of plants.
