“Women are eager to work and have as much aspiration as men to advance at work. It therefore seems strange that organisations are so stubborn to adapt in order to recognise the patterns of unequal power relations and to acknowledge the societal impediments that women face,” says Anita Bosch, professor at the University of Stellenbosch Business School (USB) and editor of the report.
“Once organisations take the realities of women seriously, women and men will be able to participate differently at work bringing their full selves and talents to bear. When employees make it known that they feel that they are being treated unfairly, it takes a thoughtful manager to stop and listen for often in the perceived whine, is a little piece of truth, uncomfortable as it may be.”
She says fairness is a rather vague and debatable concept that is often swept under the carpet as a non-issue.
“The perception of fairness depends on the delicate interplay of socialised norms, cultural values, psychological predisposition and religious convictions. This interplay is couched in power relations, a power that presents itself as subtle and covert. They manifest in inequitable practices that are passed off as ‘the reality’ or ‘the way things work’.”
“Women are caught up in this power play, as they cannot always articulate a different way of being and acting. The way their choices are presented to them seems fixed and unchangeable. A woman may therefore be stuck in merely voicing her dissatisfaction or bearing it. As a result the status quo remains as the power-behaviour is either not conscious or altering the balance may result in perceived loss of power to those people or institutions that are manifesting the behaviour.”
“Socialised norms are greatly influenced by repeated behaviour that reinforces the expectations of the particular society or group to which one belongs. The socialisation of girls to be good mothers and wives, which in general is laudable, is probably the most influential and is in direct conflict with workplace requirements.
“The main responsibility for parenting is more often than not placed at the feet of women. South African studies have asserted that it is an accepted norm that men will be both present and absent at home. Their absence, which is reinforced by paternalism, results in an uneven distribution of care responsibilities.
“The good mother norm, which is measured by devotion to and high amounts of time spent on the needs of children as well as the running a well-functioning household, constricts women. Outsourcing childcare allegedly makes one a bad mother and the dutifulness and devotion to a husband’s needs including boosting his status, is presented as a woman’s main focus. Even women that do not have children and single women feel the pressure to conform to these norms.
“A woman, with or without children, is therefore measured as either a good mother/wife or an ideal worker — seldom both.”
She says in addition workers are spending more and more time at work and in a demanding competitive culture, overwork has become virtuous.
“Whilst organisations may reap the financial benefits from allowing overwork cultures, employees are often caught on a treadmill of ever increasing demands that eventually consume their lives. As women carry the burden of unequal distribution of home and child care, keeping up with the overwork culture becomes exhausting and may eventually lead to the option to opt out of paid work altogether. The argument that they willingly choose to leave is therefore a half-truth – they are often forced out.
“Since women do not want to fragment their families by relying on parents and other family members to assist in shouldering the responsibility of care and nurture for their children, they may stop pursing their careers with vigour. These ‘choices’ are hard ones to make and leave women feeling disillusioned and weak. To add insult to injury the inequality between men and women with similar credentials, education and abilities is attributed to a lack of talent, effort or desire on the part of women.”
Prof Bosch recommends the following steps on shifting societal norms that penetrate workplace logic:
Open online discussion
USB will be hosting a special discussion on the report on 7 August at 6pm at its Belville campus. Register online here.
The annual Women’s Report is co-sponsored by the University of Stellenbosch Business School (USB) and the University of Johannesburg (UJ). The South African Board for People Practices (SABPP) supports the report and remains committed to workplace equality and the advancement of evidence-based knowledge that could ultimately lead to improved representation and increased productivity in South Africa.
Contributors to the report include Professor Anita Bosch (USB), Professor Piet Naudé (USB), Professor Amanda Gouws (University of Stellenbosch), Professor Hugo Pienaar and Riola Kok (both from Cliffe Dekker Hofmeyer Inc) and Professor Mariette Coetzee (UNISA).
To view the report, go to SABPP Womens Report 2017.
